Tuesday, October 8, 2013

Beowulf: Compare and Contrast

            When I heard that in English IV we were going to read Beowulf, I thought to myself, wow I get to read the book version of the story. I had already seen the movie so I thought I was going to be the one that knows it all. That I was going to be ahead of everyone else, boy was I wrong. There are so many differences from the book version and the movie, but there were three very important differences that impacted the story completely. Hrothgar gave Beowulf his kingdom, Beowulf did not kill Grendels mother, and Beowulf was the father of the dragon.

            In the text Beowulf did became king, King of Sweden, but in the movie Hrothgar gives Beowulf his kingdom. In other words Beowulf becomes king of Denmark; in the movie Hrothgar commits suicide. In the text it doesn’t say what happen to Hrothgar or the rest of the Danes after Beowulf left. Another thing that was different and was really unexpected was that Beowulf had a thing for Queen Wealhtheow. In the text Beowulf and the Queen didn’t even speak to each other, she wasn’t mention until Beowulf killed Grendels mother and the Danes were celebrating. In the movie, I thought Beowulf and Wealhtheow would have a great relationship because of the chemistry it showed they had. And boy was I wrong, Beowulf messed everything up when he didn't kill Grendel’s mother. Instead he made a deal with the fiend.

            In the text Beowulf killed Grendels mother, but in the movie he didn’t. The reason why I think Beowulf neglected to kill the mother was because she was beautiful. In the text they described her as a horrible monster, Grendel’s mother’s beauty lead to a one night stand. He’s a man and when a beautiful woman is basically throwing herself at him, he couldn't resist. Then he goes to Heorot and be all like, “Yeah people, I Beowulf have slain your monsters, yep I killed all of them,” he lied and everyone believed him. Everyone expect for King Hrothgar, he knew the truth because he did the same thing years ago.
            The one night stand between Beowulf and Grendels mother lead to something that was very big and made the story become more interesting. The dragon that lead to the death of our protagonist is actually the son of Beowulf and Grendel’s mother. When we started reading the story and it didn’t mention anything about the dragon being related to Beowulf I was shocked. Then when we were watched the movie and the dragon transformed into a human and said, “I have a message for my father,” I wasn't shocked like the rest of the class; well those who were paying attention.


            In my opinion I preferred the movie then the text; I think the text was just valance after valance. While in the movie it was more to it than just an epic hero killing monsters. The movie had the epic hero fathering the monster that lead to his death, I think it was a better story then just having Beowulf killing the dragon. The ending of the movie was also better then the ending of the text. In the movie they left you in a cliffhanger  while in the text it just ended with no suspense or anything. So as you see there were many differences between the movie version and the book version.

Monday, September 16, 2013

The Devil and Tom Walker



Characters Analysis:
I can infer that Tom Walkers wife is a greedy person, because the author said "She urged her husband to comply with the black man's term and secure what would make them wealthy for life.” The author used indirect characterizations. I can also infer that his wife hid stuff from her husband, the author used direct characterizations. “Whatever the women would lay her hands on she hid away.” The author also says that Tom’s wife was miserly; the author also used direct characterization. “He had a wife as miserly as himself.”
            I can infer that the black man is in fact the devil himself. I could infer, when the author wrote, "I am he to whom the red people devoted this spot and now and then roasted a white man by way of sweet smelling sacrifice." The author used indirect characterization. I can also infer that the black man is the devil because of how the author described him. “His face was neither black nor copper colour, but swarthy and dingy and begrimed with soot, as if he had been accustomed to toil among fires and forges.”  Once I heard that I pictured the devil in my head.
I can infer that Tom Walker is a nosy person, because in the story it said, "The husband was continually prying about to detect her secret hoards." The author used direct characterization. I can also infer that Tom Walker is a very brave man, because he was not scared to go through the swamp where others say that it was an evil place, and also because he faced the devil without fearing him.

Thursday, August 29, 2013

I am, I can, I will

I am creative 
I am funny 
I am strong and independent 
I am caring 
I am a dreamer 
I am...

I can create stories out of thin air
I can imagine things others can't 
I can speak two languages 
I can reach the stars, if I push myself 
I can...

I will make it on my own
I will graduate high school
I will achieve greatness 
I will go on beyond of what is expected of me

And I will, I can, I am
Veronica